Fire safety experts called for an investigation after government data revealed the first conclusive proof that timber-frame buildings suffer more damage than other kinds of structure in a fire, Building reported.
The annual Fire Statistics Monitor, published by the Communities department, shows that timber frame is more vulnerable during and after construction.
James Glocking, technical director of the Fire Protection Association, welcomed the report but said an investigation was needed.
One of the report’s findings was that there were 118 fires in completed non-residential timber-frame buildings compared with 774 for all other forms of construction.
This is not a paywall. Registration allows us to enhance your experience across Construction Management and ensure we deliver you quality editorial content.
Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings.
Glocking said: “That seems to be a disproportionately high number given the tiny number of non-residential timber-frame buildings. We need to make sense of that figure.”
His calls for an inquiry were backed by insurance industry figures concerned by the high value of claims arising from timber frame fires. Douglas Barnett, head of customer risk management at Axa, said: “It’s good to see statistics that show what we have been saying for a while. It’s our general feeling there are large issues that need to be addressed, such as build quality.”
Glocking, who is also concerned with workmanship issues, is helping the industry to produce best practice guides. These would be aimed at specialist trades including electricians, plumbers and bricklayers and made available through trade associations. He said he also wanted to produce a guide for occupiers and DIY-ers.
But the timber-frame industry dismissed the figures. Geoff Arnold, the UK Timber Frame Association’s chairman, said the report “lacked any real substance when it comes to understanding the issue of fire in timber frame”.
“The data shows that of 34,783 dwelling fires in the UK, only 359 were timber frame, which is 1% of the total. How can we knock timber frame when most serious fires in dwellings are something other than timber frame?”
Bob Neill, the minister in charge of fire safety at the communities department, said: “We’ll work with the industry to establish whether there is evidence of specific risks associated with timber-framed buildings. We are also actively awaiting a London Assembly report on this issue and will look at its conclusions.”
