The call came after an Opposition Day debate on the matter yesterday (1 February) in the House of Commons.
A cross-party group of MPs voted to support a motion that urges the government to provide funding to fix unsafe homes and ensure that the financial burden of remediation does not fall on leaseholders and tenants.
This is not a paywall. Registration allows us to enhance your experience across Construction Management and ensure we deliver you quality editorial content.
Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings.
The CIOB, which has been monitoring the issue of cladding and building safety closely, said that while the vote was not legally binding, it sent a “clear message” about the strength of feeling on the issue and a need to find a solution to protect leaseholders and those living in potentially unsafe buildings.
In a statement, the CIOB said: “While there is no doubt that it is a complex matter, with a long list of stakeholders, new figures from the New Build Database and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) indicate that up to 11 million people in the UK are impacted by this issue, living in accommodation that is potentially unsafe and, in many instances, faced with the prospect of a financial commitment to rectify something over which they had no influence or control. This is causing unnecessary distress to many and is clearly unacceptable.
A funding solution should not penalise leaseholders and leave them burdened with paying
CIOB
“New proposals for a loan scheme may still lead to leaseholders bearing some costs being imposed on them by landlords. It is encouraging that there is political will across all parties to take further action, but the CIOB would like to see the government commit to act immediately.
"Government should prioritise the ongoing risk assessments regarding where aluminium composite material (ACM) may be present, confirm measures to make those buildings safe as soon as possible and find a funding solution which does not penalise leaseholders and leave them burdened with paying, even in part, for historical building safety remediation works, whilst ensuring that these costs are excluded from the proposed building safety charge.”
These were also amongst the key recommendations of the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee (HCLG) pre-legislative scrutiny of the Building Safety Bill published last year, to which the CIOB contributed at the evidence gathering stage: Pre-legislative scrutiny of the Building Safety Bill. The government is due to formally respond to this report shortly.
The CIOB added: "It’s clear that, when there is more information from detailed risk assessments on the scale of ACM still present and more progress with the removals programme, the construction industry will be key in ensuring such a situation can never happen again. In the short- to medium-term, this means that replacement work is carried out to the highest standards.
"Over the longer-term, although the work has already started among key industry stakeholders, the need is to ensure that lessons are learned and, crucially, embedded across the sector, with a commitment to quality and safety present throughout the construction sector."
