Vox pop: Is EU membership good for construction?
Lee Kyson MCIOB, MD, Kyson Construction
We would definitely benefit from staying in the EU. I previously set up a plastering and external wall insulation business in Germany that ran for about 14 years, which I thoroughly enjoyed, and that type of opportunity would be much more difficult if the UK became independent of Europe.
Leaving the EU could make it harder for individual UK professionals to get work on projects in Europe, perhaps requiring a work permit, and UK firms will have to navigate extra bureaucracy to qualify to tender for a job. Even after winning a job, the procurement route could prevent you from importing the products and materials you’re used to using from the UK.
Register for free and continue reading
This is not a paywall. Registration allows us to enhance your experience across Construction Management and ensure we deliver you quality editorial content.
Registering also means you can manage your own CPDs, comments, newsletter sign-ups and privacy settings.
The UK also depends on countless materials and products that come over from Germany and leaving Europe could impose more trade barriers or red tape related to importing or exporting construction materials, which would create a big headache for the industry.
Barbara Entwistle FCIOB, area manager, Velux
Europe will be stronger if we stick together, the EU construction sector is predicted to grow over the next year, and our professionals benefit from being able to work in European countries and vice versa. Countries with economic difficulties like Spain and Italy have suffered massive drops in construction activity, but political and economic fluctuations are to be expected in different countries and the future should be about stabilisation, getting away from the boom or bust culture and countries supporting each other.
The UK is too deeply involved in Europe to simply decide to pull out, let’s also not forget that construction at home benefits from millions of pounds-worth of EU grants, notably on housing, education and environmental-based projects, which in some cases would not have been able to go ahead without it, plus research and development and training grants that bring new technologies and skills into the sector.
Rob Hooker, director, Greendale Construction
Leaving the EU would be a bad thing for the UK construction industry. I am not impressed with the UKIP “little Englander” approach, we are in a global market and major trade is done with the EU. We need to be part of it to be able to influence and manage the governance of the EU to the benefit of our builders. Although EU red tape definitely needs to be curbed, the continued engagement of foreign labour is vital to reduce skills shortages, we are simply not training enough people in the UK in science, technology, engineering and mathematics and construction subjects.
The best way forward in determining our future is the Conservatives’ proposal for a referendum, which will allow the people to decide once and for all whether we stay in or out. That’s democracy working as it should do.
Phillip Hall, MD, Hall Construction
It’s hard to argue against being in Europe when you’re connected to it by road, via the Channel Tunnel. The fact we can bring in labour from abroad is often a benefit to us rather than a hindrance, and depending on the fluctuating cycles of work, workers from Poland and elsewhere play an important role in augmenting the labour force to deliver projects.
Leaving Europe could jeopardise working opportunities for UK companies and individuals on the mainland and damage trade and business. I’ve been advising a friend who’s renovating a historic property in France who has been using a lot of skilled British ex-pat workers, who are really benefiting from our countries’ close relationship. However, EU legislation is very onerous and it should be streamlined, the UK seems to be one of the only countries that follows it to the letter.
Mike Smith, MD, Corniche Builders
I’m undecided. Opinions on Europe have so far been too politically driven and lead by gut reaction and personal prejudice rather than fact, what’s needed is a thorough cost-benefit analysis, assessing the benefits of remaining in Europe to our economy and to construction. Like it or not, we have an acute labour shortage, so the influx of cheaper foreign labour has been an asset, mostly in and around greater London where it made up for huge skills losses during the recession.
The flow of skills and work between the UK and the rest of the EU has a major financial impact, and some EU legislation, such as on health and safety, will have had a positive impact. We must also consider the costs associated with a decision to leave the EU, as dismantling current systems and legislation and creating new independent regulations for construction will be very expensive and add new layers of bureaucracy.
Mark Wakeford, chair of The Construction Alliance
The Construction Alliance doesn’t have a formal position on this, partly because the views of our members vary and we believe that there is a better factual debate on the key issues. Broadly, our membership will recognise the value of belonging to a club that enables free trade and the movement of people and skills across the Europe.
We also value the development activity that membership creates in other sectors and the value the standardisation of specifications that allows economic construction. However, as with all in business, we would relish a lessening in red tape, be it from Europe or Whitehall, but we remain to be convinced that our departure from Europe would result in less bureaucracy.









